Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(→Evaluation aspects) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We have students all over UBC wanting the MAGIC specialization. Even the guy who won the best paper award in CHI this year is trying to add it (as if he needs it) | We have students all over UBC wanting the MAGIC specialization. Even the guy who won the best paper award in CHI this year is trying to add it (as if he needs it) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Evaluation aspects == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evaluation was sprinkled throughout the other topics, I feel that it needs to be highlighted as a coherent field--- IMHO it is really difficult to teach in dribs and drabs | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Bfisher|Bfisher]] 14:22, 14 Aug 2006 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:22, 14 August 2006
One thing I would not like to lose sight of is the possibility of cross-linkage with other departments to create new areas of concentration-- SIAT-Contemporary Arts, SIAT-Business, SIAT-Kinesiology, SIAT-Cognitive Science, perhaps somesday SIAT-CS. We should find ways that our courses fulfill requirements for other majors in such a way that a minor can be done with minimal hassle and can deliver a package that interests students.
We have students all over UBC wanting the MAGIC specialization. Even the guy who won the best paper award in CHI this year is trying to add it (as if he needs it)
Evaluation aspects
Evaluation was sprinkled throughout the other topics, I feel that it needs to be highlighted as a coherent field--- IMHO it is really difficult to teach in dribs and drabs
Bfisher 14:22, 14 Aug 2006 (PDT)
